WoofWatt Labs  /  Engineering feasibility report

WOOFWATT

Engineering a real bark-energy harvester

A detailed feasibility study, prototype design, energy model, test program, and humane hybrid alternative for turning canine commotion into measurable electricity.

Bottom line
Literal bark harvesting is physically real but electrically tiny. A tuned acoustic device can accumulate enough energy for occasional LED or sensor events. Useful watt-hours require capturing the dog's voluntary body motion, not merely the sound.

A practical engineering answer to a gloriously impractical question.

Prepared 17 Aug 2026  |  Revision 1.0

Section 1

Executive readout

This report answers two different questions. Can a bark be converted to electricity? Yes. Can barking power a useful household load? Not realistically. The best outcome is a demonstrator that stores microjoules from sound, paired with a voluntary kinetic generator if meaningful energy is desired.

Reference yield
1.58 µJ
per modeled bark
Optimistic yield
88.5 µJ
close, tuned case
Daily at 1,000
0.00002 Wh
optimistic acoustic
Useful alternative
1.25 Wh
20 min kinetic case

Recommendation: Build the acoustic unit as a visible science instrument: horn, resonant piezo array, rectifier, storage capacitor, and threshold LED. If the goal shifts from demonstration to useful energy, add a voluntary tug-wheel or dog-driven treadmill generator. Do not provoke barking to improve the numbers.

Decision matrix

ConceptRealityBest useVerdict
Microphone as generatorExtremely little harvestable power; common microphones consume powerDetection onlyReject as harvester
Piezo diaphragm + hornReal charge accumulation at high SPL, strongly frequency dependentLED, counter, sensor eventBuild demonstrator
Floor/paw piezo tileMore mechanical energy, but irregular and modestCounters, low-duty sensorsOptional experiment
Tug wheel / treadmillWatts are plausible from voluntary motionLighting, USB storage, educational displayBest useful pathway

What success looks like

  • The device proves net-positive acoustic harvesting by charging a known capacitor above its leakage baseline.
  • A visible event occurs only after stored energy reaches a threshold; no wall power secretly drives the effect.
  • A separately powered logger measures SPL, voltage, bark duration, temperature, and cumulative joules.
  • The dog is never restrained, startled, rewarded for continuous barking, or exposed to a feedback sound.

Report map

PartQuestion answered
Physics and limitsHow much acoustic energy exists, and how much can reach a collector?
Acoustic prototypeWhat should be built, from horn to capacitor?
Energy modelWhat can it power, and how many barks are required?
Hybrid designHow can dog activity produce useful watt-hours humanely?
ValidationHow do we measure honestly and decide whether to continue?
Section 2

The physics of a bark

Sound is alternating pressure. An energy harvester must intercept part of the wave, turn diaphragm motion into electrical charge, rectify that alternating signal, and store more energy than the circuit leaks. The logarithmic decibel scale makes loud sound feel impressive while still representing surprisingly little total power.

Core equations

QuantityEquationMeaning
Sound pressure levelLp = 20 log10(prms / p0)p0 = 20 µPa in air
Approx. intensityI = I0 · 10(Lp/10)I0 is approximately 10−12 W/m²
Incident powerPin = I · AA is effective capture area
Electrical bark energyEelec = I · A · η · tη combines acoustic, mechanical, and electrical efficiency
Capacitor energyEC = ½ C (V2² − V1²)Best simple measurement of harvested energy

Acoustic intensity rises 10× for every +10 dB

Figure 1. Calculated using I = 10−12 × 10(Lp/10). These are approximate free-field intensities at the harvester, not claims about a particular dog.

Every +10 dB multiplies intensity by 10. Moving a collector closer can help because free-field intensity declines approximately with 1/r², but the dog's near field, head orientation, room reflections, and bark spectrum make real results less tidy than the textbook curve.

A useful upper-bound check

If 95 dB SPL were measured 1 m from a roughly spherical source, the inferred acoustic power would be P = 4πr²I, or about 0.040 W while the bark is occurring. A 0.5 s bark would contain about 0.020 J of radiated sound. A 100 cm² collector at that distance geometrically intercepts only about 0.08% of the sphere before conversion losses. That leaves roughly 1.6 µJ at 10% conversion efficiency.

Why measured SPL must be local

  • Specify dB SPL at the mouth of the collector, not somewhere else in the room.
  • Record A-weighted level for human exposure context, but also capture unweighted or Z-weighted spectral data for engineering.
  • Use the peak and time-integrated waveform; a single maximum dB number cannot determine energy.
  • Measure orientation and distance. A dog is neither an isotropic speaker nor a calibrated signal generator.
Section 3

Energy model and assumptions

The scenarios below are deliberately explicit. SPL is assumed at the collector, area is effective acoustic aperture, and efficiency is end-to-end conversion before storage. They are planning cases, not measured dog data. The close/resonant case is an optimistic design target that must be proven on a loudspeaker before involving the dog.

ScenarioSPLAreaEfficiencyDurationEnergy/barkAt 1,000 barks
Conservative85 dB50 cm²3%0.30 s0.0142 µJ3.95e−09 Wh
Reference95 dB100 cm²10%0.50 s1.58 µJ4.39e−07 Wh
Close/resonant105 dB200 cm²20%0.70 s88.5 µJ2.46e−05 Wh

Modeled electrical yield per bark

Figure 2. End-to-end modeled energy per bark. Log scale is essential because the cases span more than three orders of magnitude.

Interpretation

  • The reference case produces about 1.58 µJ per bark. One thousand barks total about 0.00158 J, or 0.000000439 Wh.
  • The close/resonant case produces about 88.5 µJ per bark. One thousand barks total about 0.0885 J, or 0.0000246 Wh.
  • A typical phone battery contains on the order of tens of watt-hours. Even a tiny percentage therefore dwarfs the daily acoustic yield.
  • Resonance can raise diaphragm displacement at selected frequencies, but a bark is broadband and variable. A single narrow resonator will miss much of it.

Sensitivity: which knob matters?

ChangeFirst-order effectEngineering catch
+10 dB SPL10× energyNoise exposure and dog comfort become dominant constraints
2× aperture area2× intercepted energyLarger diaphragm may detune or become mechanically fragile
2× bark duration2× energyDo not encourage longer barking
2× conversion efficiency2× stored energyDifficult across a broad, transient spectrum
½ distance in ideal far fieldApprox. 4× intensityNear-field geometry and safe placement limit the benefit

The model is linear in area, time, and efficiency, but exponential in dB. That does not make louder barking a good optimization strategy. Optimize the collector and electronics; do not optimize the animal.

Section 4

Literal acoustic harvester

The most credible build is a passive acoustic front end feeding piezoelectric diaphragms, followed by a low-leakage rectifier, storage capacitor, voltage monitor, and threshold-switched load. A separately powered measurement channel proves what the harvester itself contributes.

Barkpressure wave
Horn + cavitiesfrequency capture
Piezo arrayAC charge
Rectifierlow leakage
Storage10 mF cap
release after threshold ↓
Threshold load switchLED pulse / sensor event
Figure 3. Proposed energy path. The sensing/logger path is intentionally separate and externally powered.

4.1 Acoustic front end

  • Use a flared horn or shallow parabolic mouth with 200–400 cm² physical aperture. Its purpose is pressure concentration and directionality, not magic amplification of total energy.
  • Split the horn into three interchangeable Helmholtz cavities targeting roughly 350, 700, and 1,400 Hz. Final frequencies should come from an actual bark spectrum.
  • Mount a flexible diaphragm at each cavity's high-pressure region. Candidate transducers: PVDF film for sensitivity, piezo bimorphs for strain, or metal-backed piezo discs for low cost.
  • Isolate the enclosure from floor vibration during acoustic tests. Otherwise footsteps can masquerade as harvested sound.

Helmholtz starting point

For a cavity with neck area An, effective neck length Leff, cavity volume V, and sound speed c, start with fH = c/(2π) · √(An / (V · Leff)). Treat this as an initial geometry estimate; the diaphragm compliance, losses, end correction, and enclosure walls shift the real resonance.

4.2 Transducer and rectifier

ElementRecommended starting pointReason
Transducer array3 to 6 piezo elements, individually characterizedMultiple resonances beat one narrow element
RectifierLow-leakage Schottky bridge first; compare with active rectificationSimple baseline, then optimize diode loss
Reservoir100 µF at rectifier, followed by 10 mF storageSeparates bark pulses from long accumulation
ProtectionClamp sized below piezo/electronics limitsPiezo open-circuit voltage can spike
Power managementBQ25570-class harvester IC only after source characterizationCold start and source impedance may dominate
Load switchNanopower supervisor with hysteresisPrevents the load from draining storage continuously

The Texas Instruments BQ25570 is designed for high-impedance energy-harvesting sources, with a 600 mV cold-start requirement and continued harvesting from inputs as low as 100 mV under specified conditions. A piezo source still needs rectification, adequate open-circuit voltage, and an impedance match. The IC is a candidate, not a guarantee.

Section 5

Storage and honest load sizing

Harvested power is intermittent. The load must remain disconnected while a capacitor accumulates charge, then run in a short burst. A constantly powered microcontroller can easily consume more than the bark harvester produces.

Idealized capacitor accumulation in the close/resonant case

Figure 4. Idealized 10 mF charge curve using the close/resonant scenario and 70% storage efficiency. Leakage, threshold overhead, and imperfect matching will increase the count.

Threshold strategy

  • Charge the storage capacitor with the harvester completely isolated from the logging electronics.
  • At an upper threshold, such as 3.3 V, enable the load through a supervisor or comparator.
  • At a lower threshold, such as 2.4 V, disconnect the load. Hysteresis prevents chatter.
  • Make the output tiny and satisfying: one high-efficiency LED pulse or one latched e-paper counter increment.
Illustrative load budget. Load figures are engineering allowances, not component guarantees.
Illustrative load budgetEnergyReference barksClose/resonant barks
Visible LED pulse0.0002 J1814
Sensor sample + BLE advertisement0.005 J4,51881
Small e-paper status update0.05 J45,176807
Wi-Fi wake and short POST0.5 J451,7548,068
Phone battery, 1% of 15 Wh540 J487,894,2688,712,398

Best modeled case: how many barks pay the energy bill?

Figure 5. Calculated from the close/resonant case after a 30% storage loss. Load figures are engineering allowances, not component guarantees.

Do not put the ESP32 on the harvested rail during early testing. Let an external USB supply power the logger while the harvested rail powers only the capacitor and proof load. Otherwise the measurement system eats the evidence.

Section 6

Buildable prototype: BarkSpark Mark I

The first prototype should prove energy transfer with controlled speaker tests, then passively observe naturally occurring barks. Its target is not continuous operation; its target is a defensible capacitor-voltage rise attributable to acoustic excitation.

Mechanical specification

SubsystemStarting specificationAdjustment range
Horn300 × 220 mm mouth, 180–300 mm long, printed or foam boardSwap throat inserts
CavitiesThree sealed chambers, approximately 0.25–2.0 LSliding neck length or plug set
Diaphragms50–100 µm thin polymer or metal membraneInterchangeable tension frames
PiezoPVDF strip plus low-cost disc comparisonSeries/parallel configurations
MountTripod or weighted stand, 0.5–1.5 m from dog zoneHeight and yaw adjustable
Acoustic liningRemovable felt on non-active wallsTune damping and Q

Electrical specification

NodeInstrumentMeasurement
Piezo AC10 MΩ or higher differential probeOpen-circuit waveform, frequency, peak voltage
After rectifierLow-burden current/voltage loggerPulse charge and diode loss
Storage capacitorHigh-impedance ADC divider, duty-cycledV before/after event and leakage curve
SoundCalibrated Class 2 sound level meter plus recorderSPL, spectrum, duration at aperture
Isolation controlSame apparatus with horn blockedRejects vibration and EMI artifacts

Illustrative bill of materials

ItemQtyPlanning rangeNotes
Horn/cavity material1 set$20–$50Foam board, printed parts, gasket, threaded necks
PVDF film elements3$20–$60Compare with inexpensive piezo discs
Low-leakage rectifier parts1 set$8–$25Schottky baseline plus active option
Capacitors and protection1 set$8–$20100 µF reservoir, 10 mF storage, clamps
Supervisor/load switch/LED1 set$8–$25Nanopower threshold control
Measurement MCU1$10–$25Externally powered, not part of harvest claim
Enclosure and hardware1$20–$50Tripod mount, shielding, strain relief
Estimated total$94–$255Excludes oscilloscope and calibrated SPL meter

Prices are rough planning ranges as of the report date, not vendor quotes. Start with cheap piezo discs and a passive bridge. Buy an energy-harvesting IC only after measurements show the source voltage, impedance, and available power can satisfy it.

Section 7

The useful version: WoofWatt Hybrid

If the objective is energy you can actually use, the dog's muscles are the available power source. Bark detection can remain the playful trigger, but it should not be counted as generated energy. The generator runs only through voluntary, positively trained activity.

The WoofWatt hybrid

1. DetectMic classifies a bark. No harvested power is claimed.
2. InviteLight shows a voluntary activity is available.
3. GenerateTug wheel or treadmill turns a real generator.
4. Reward calmOutput unlocks only after quiet time.

Design principle: The bark is the user interface. Motion is the useful energy source. Calmness earns the outcome.

Figure 6. Bark-aware control with actual energy supplied by motion. The output is released after a quiet interval so the system does not reward nonstop barking.

Sound is the weakest dog-powered energy pathway

Figure 7. Illustrative engineering cases on a log scale. Assumptions: 5 mJ net per paw-tile step; 5 W electrical for five minutes of tug activity; 3.75 W electrical for twenty minutes of treadmill activity.

Reference kinetic calculation

For a deliberately light resisting force F = 5 N, belt speed v = 1.5 m/s, and total mechanical-to-electrical efficiency η = 50%: P = F · v · η = 3.75 W. Over 20 minutes, E = 3.75 × 20/60 = 1.25 Wh. This is about 50,000 times the modeled acoustic energy from 1,000 close/resonant barks.

Preferred mechanisms

MechanismEnergy potentialControl and welfare notes
Tug-wheel generatorShort bursts of several watts are plausibleTorque limiter; quick release; soft tug; stop on disengagement
Self-propelled slat treadmillMost consistent watt-level pathVoluntary entry/exit; no tether; mechanical brake; human supervision
Paw pressure tileMillijoules per step, highly design dependentFlush, nonslip, no startling movement or click
Ball-return flywheelEnergy recovered from a play mechanismDog should not contact gears, belt, or spinning mass

Electrical chain

  • Low-speed permanent-magnet generator or stepper motor used as generator.
  • Bridge rectifier, overvoltage clamp, buck/boost stage, and a protected LiFePO4 pack or supercapacitor module.
  • Hall sensor or encoder measures revolutions; current and voltage sensors calculate real watt-hours.
  • Physical emergency stop, finger/paw guards, current limiting, thermal cutoff, and a fuse.
Section 8

Control system and data model

The bark detector is a user-interface channel, not an energy meter. Run it on a separate low-voltage supply. Its job is to classify events, avoid false triggers, and coordinate a calm-reward sequence.

State machine

StateEntry conditionActionExit condition
IDLESystem armedListen with local inference; no rewardConfident bark cluster
BARK_SEEN2+ bark events within 5 sIlluminate invitation icon; start quiet timerDog engages activity or timeout
GENERATINGWheel/belt movementMeasure V, I, RPM, and cumulative WhMotion stops
QUIET_WAITGeneration completeRequire 10–20 s below bark thresholdQuiet interval achieved
RELEASEQuiet interval achievedPulse LED, update display, optionally launch ballOne-shot action complete
LOCKOUTRate or stress limit reachedDisable invitations; continue passive loggingManual reset or cooldown

Bark-event record

FieldType/unitPurpose
timestampUTCEvent sequence and daily totals
spl_peak_db, leq_dbdBLevel at collector and exposure context
duration_msmsEnergy integration
band_energyarrayResonator tuning and classifier input
confidence0–1Reject TV, clap, door slam, and human speech
v_cap_before, v_cap_afterVDirect stored-energy calculation
energy_increment_ujµJ0.5·C·Δ(V²), corrected for leakage
distance_cm, orientationmetadataExplains geometric variation
generator_whWhSeparate kinetic total; never mix with acoustic yield

Pseudocode

on_bark(event):
  if event.confidence < 0.85: return
  if daily_bark_rate > welfare_limit: enter_lockout()
  E = 0.5 * C * (V_after^2 - V_before^2) - leakage_baseline
  acoustic_joules += max(E, 0)
  show_invitation_only_if_cooldown_complete()

on_motion(sample):
  kinetic_wh += sample.volts * sample.amps * sample.dt / 3600
  stop_if_guard_open_or_temperature_high()

on_motion_end():
  wait_for_quiet(15 seconds)
  release_one_reward_event()
Section 9

Validation plan

A credible experiment must distinguish sound-driven charge from structural vibration, electromagnetic pickup, temperature drift, and instrument loading. The sequence below does that before any passive dog observation.

Phase 0 — characterize losses

  • Charge each candidate capacitor to known voltages and log decay for 24 hours with the harvester disconnected.
  • Measure the logger divider and rectifier leakage separately. Establish the minimum detectable energy increment.
  • Reject a storage component if expected daily leakage exceeds modeled daily acoustic input.

Phase 1 — controlled speaker sweep

  • Use a loudspeaker and calibrated meter at the collector aperture. Sweep 100 Hz to 3 kHz at 5–10 Hz resolution around resonances.
  • Test 80, 90, 95, 100, and 105 dB only within equipment and hearing-safety constraints.
  • For each point, record 10 repeated 0.5 s bursts and capacitor delta-V. Randomize test order to reduce thermal bias.
  • Repeat with the horn blocked, with the structure mechanically isolated, and with the piezo replaced by an equivalent dummy capacitance.

Phase 2 — recorded-bark playback

  • Replay a bark waveform at calibrated levels and multiple orientations. This provides repeatability without provoking the dog.
  • Tune the three cavity necks to maximize net stored energy across the bark spectrum, not peak voltage alone.
  • Compare series and parallel piezo wiring. Report both open-circuit voltage and energy into the actual rectifier/storage load.

Phase 3 — passive natural observation

  • Position the collector outside reach, allow free movement and retreat, and record only naturally occurring barking.
  • Do not cue, tease, withhold necessities, or use aversive devices to obtain samples.
  • Stop if barking appears distressed, escalates, or is accompanied by pacing, destruction, elimination, escape attempts, or other concerning behavior.
Primary calculation

For every event, compute Estored = 0.5 · C (Vafter² − Vbefore²) − Eleakage − Emeasurement. Report median, interquartile range, and 95% confidence interval across events. Never infer energy solely from peak piezo voltage.

Go/no-go gates

GatePass criterionIf it fails
Net-positive captureMedian stored delta exceeds 5× measurement floorImprove rectification or stop acoustic work
RepeatabilityCoefficient of variation below 30% in speaker testsStabilize geometry and load
Useful demoOne visible LED event in 100 or fewer calibrated burstsUse e-paper counter or accept slower demo
Animal welfareNo induced barking, restraint, startle, or stress signsStop dog trials; use recordings only
Truthful accountingAcoustic and kinetic joules separately measuredRedesign instrumentation
Section 10

Safety, welfare, and failure modes

A dog barking nonstop is first a behavior or health signal, not a renewable-resource opportunity. Identify why the dog is barking. Sudden, persistent, or distress-linked barking warrants veterinary or qualified behavior-professional attention.

Non-negotiable design constraints

  • Nothing attaches to the dog's muzzle, throat, collar, or body for acoustic collection.
  • No shock, ultrasonic feedback, startling spray, punishment, restraint, forced treadmill use, or closed-loop sound amplification.
  • The dog controls participation and can leave immediately. Human supervision is required for kinetic machinery.
  • Rewards occur after quiet behavior, not immediately after barking. Apply rate limits and cooldowns.
  • Guard all pinch points, gears, belts, electrical conductors, hot parts, and stored-energy components.

Failure mode and effects analysis

Failure modeEffectDetectionMitigation
Circuit leakage exceeds harvestFalse expectation; no accumulation24 h capacitor decay testLower-leakage parts; smaller storage; threshold pulse
Vibration masquerades as soundInvalid energy claimBlocked-horn and isolation controlsDecouple mount; compare dummy transducer
Resonance misses bark spectrumLow or inconsistent outputSpectral scan and recorded playbackThree cavities; adjustable necks; damping
Rectifier threshold lossCharge never reaches storageProbe AC and rectified nodesHigher piezo voltage; active rectifier; impedance match
Dog learns barking starts playBarking increasesBehavior log and rate trendQuiet-delay reward; cooldown; disable trigger
Mechanical runaway/pinchAnimal or human injurySpeed, guard, temperature sensorsTorque limit; guards; emergency stop; supervision
Battery faultHeat, fire, cell damageBMS and thermal monitoringProtected pack, fuse, nonflammable enclosure
Loud test exposureHuman or animal hearing riskCalibrated SPL and timed exposureUse short bursts, distance, barriers, and hearing guidance

Behavior note

The ASPCA recommends first identifying the function of the bark; different causes require different responses. Persistent barking when alone can accompany separation anxiety, particularly when combined with pacing, destruction, elimination, depression, or escape behavior. The engineering project should never displace that assessment.

Section 11

Implementation roadmap

The fastest route to a defensible result is staged. Each phase ends with a measurable decision, so enthusiasm does not outrun the joules.

PhaseDurationDeliverablesExit decision
A. Instrument1 weekendSPL logging, capacitor leakage test, piezo waveform captureIs measurement floor below 0.1 µJ?
B. Bench transducer1–2 weekendsSpeaker sweep, rectifier comparison, energy-vs-frequency plotIs stored energy repeatable and net positive?
C. Resonator array2 weekendsThree adjustable cavities, tuned with bark playbackCan 100 bursts produce a visible event?
D. Passive dog trialSeveral short sessionsNatural-event dataset; welfare log; orientation studyDoes real output match an order of magnitude of bench results?
E. Hybrid generator2–4 weekendsTug or treadmill generator, guards, current sensing, Wh displayCan voluntary motion produce 0.5–1.0 Wh safely?
F. Exhibit1 weekendTransparent enclosure, e-paper totals, honest acoustic/kinetic splitReady for demonstration

Recommended minimum viable demonstrator

FeatureMVP choice
CollectorOne adjustable Helmholtz chamber with swappable piezo elements
Storage100 µF reservoir plus 10 mF low-leakage capacitor
Proof loadSingle high-efficiency LED pulse after threshold
LoggerUSB-powered MCU and external ADC; independent harvested rail
DisplayAcoustic µJ, estimated bark count, capacitor voltage, and test mode
ControlsBlocked horn, dummy transducer, and prerecorded bark playback

Final engineering recommendation

Build BarkSpark Mark I if the goal is science, humor, and a visible proof that sound carries energy. Build WoofWatt Hybrid if the goal is useful electricity. Market neither as a phone charger.

The most honest product is an educational exhibit whose headline reads: The barking is dramatic. The wattage is not.

Success dashboard

MetricTargetMeasured result
Capacitor leakage at 3.3 V< 10% of expected daily acoustic input
Best speaker-test energy/burst> 10 µJ stored
Median recorded-bark energyReport, do not pre-judge
Barks per LED event≤ 100 calibrated bursts
Kinetic power≥ 2 W average while voluntarily active
Welfare incidents0
Appendix A

Worked calculations

A.1 Reference acoustic scenario

Inputs: Lp = 95 dB; effective area A = 0.010 m²; end-to-end efficiency η = 0.10; bark duration t = 0.50 s.

StepCalculationResult
IntensityI = 10−12 · 10(95/10)0.003162 W/m²
Incident powerP = I · A0.00003162 W
Electrical power during barkPelec = P · η0.000003162 W
Energy per barkE = Pelec · t0.000001581 J = 1.581 µJ
1,000 barks1,000 · E0.001581 J = 0.000000439 Wh

A.2 Close/resonant scenario

Inputs: Lp = 105 dB; A = 0.020 m²; η = 0.20; t = 0.70 s.

StepCalculationResult
IntensityI = 10−12 · 10(105/10)0.03162 W/m²
Incident powerP = I · A0.0006325 W
Electrical power during barkPelec = P · η0.0001265 W
Energy per barkE = Pelec · t0.00008854 J = 88.54 µJ
1,000 barks1,000 · E0.08854 J = 0.00002459 Wh

A.3 Capacitor threshold

For C = 0.010 F charged from 0 to 3.3 V, E = 0.5 × 0.010 × 3.3² = 0.05445 J. If 70% of the close/resonant 88.54 µJ reaches storage, net energy is 61.98 µJ per bark. Ideal count = 0.05445 / 0.00006198 = 879 barks. Real count will be higher because leakage grows with time and because real barks vary.

A.4 Kinetic scenario

For F = 5 N, v = 1.5 m/s, η = 0.50: P = F · v · η = 3.75 W. For 20 minutes: E = 3.75 × 20/60 = 1.25 Wh. This scenario is illustrative and must be adjusted to the dog's size, condition, interest, and veterinary guidance.

A.5 Measurement uncertainty

Capacitor energy depends on V squared, so voltage uncertainty matters more at low voltage. Propagating first-order uncertainty for E = 0.5 C(V2² − V1²) gives contributions from capacitance tolerance, ADC gain, divider tolerance, noise, and timing of before/after samples. Calibrate C directly, use precision resistors, record temperature, and calculate a blank-trial distribution.

All energy comparisons in this report are order-of-magnitude engineering estimates. Replace every scenario input with measured values before calling the prototype efficient, useful, or dog-powered.

Appendix B

Source notes and references

The calculations are derived from standard acoustics relationships. External sources support the reference pressure, energy-harvester architecture, candidate power-management electronics, measurement instrumentation, and animal-behavior safeguards. Scenario values remain explicitly modeled assumptions.

  1. CDC/NIOSH. EPHB Report No. 350-11a (2012). Defines sound pressure level using reference pressure p0 = 20 µPa and discusses time-averaged sound level.
    cdc.gov/niosh/surveyreports/pdfs/350-11a.pdf
  2. Yuan, M. et al. Recent Developments in Acoustic Energy Harvesting: A Review. Micromachines 10(1), 48 (2019). Overview of resonators, piezoelectric conversion, and acoustic-harvester architectures.
    doi.org/10.3390/mi10010048
  3. Jean, F. et al. Advancement in piezoelectric nanogenerators for acoustic energy harvesting. Microsystems & Nanoengineering (2024). Review of piezoelectric acoustic harvesting and design considerations.
    doi.org/10.1038/s41378-024-00811-4
  4. Texas Instruments. BQ25570 ultra-low-power harvester power-management IC product page and data sheet. Cold start, continuous harvesting, quiescent current, storage, and protection specifications.
    ti.com/product/BQ25570
  5. Texas Instruments. BQ25570EVM-206 evaluation module. Evaluation platform for high-impedance energy sources and storage elements.
    ti.com/tool/BQ25570EVM-206
  6. ASPCA. Barking. Guidance to identify the type and cause of excessive barking before selecting a response.
    aspca.org/pet-care/dog-care/common-dog-behavior-issues/barking
  7. ASPCA. Separation Anxiety. Describes persistent barking or howling and associated signs.
    aspca.org/pet-care/dog-care/common-dog-behavior-issues/separation-anxiety
  8. IEC 61672-1. Electroacoustics — Sound level meters — Specifications. Relevant reference for selecting a calibrated sound-level instrument.
    webstore.iec.ch/en/publication/5708

Important limitations

  • No specific dog's SPL, bark duration, frequency spectrum, distance, orientation, or daily bark count was measured for this report.
  • The 20% close/resonant efficiency is an optimistic system target, not a published bark-harvester performance claim.
  • Component prices and load-energy allowances are planning values. Verify current vendor data sheets and bench measurements.
  • This is an educational engineering report, not veterinary, behavioral, electrical-code, or product-safety certification.